Age of Empires IV and V? by Video Games

Age of Empires IV and V?

Posted in PC Games, Microsoft, Previews, Age Of Empires by ubersoldat on October 22nd, 2005. [Del.icio.us]

Just as fans seem to be busy playing Ensemble Studio’s Age of Empires III, so to do the developers. The artwork found in the game’s Collector’s edition by fans at AOE III Heaven indicate that the company has already worked on, or are planning to work on, the two next sequels!

The issue isn’t the artwork, depicting a 20th-century soldier and a futuristic conception, isn’t the controversy in itself. The issue is whether or not Ensemble Studios is merely teasing its fans, or truly indicating its plans for sequels. Microsoft Game Studios, who published the Age of Empires series, are not confirming anything at the present. “The art found in the book is purely concept art and is not confirmation of future games to come in the Age of Empires franchise,” said a company representative.

This entry was posted on Saturday, October 22nd, 2005 at 11:37 am and is tagged with aoe iii heaven, best penis enlargement pill, age of empires iii, penis enlargement pill, penis enhancement pill, best enlargement market penis pill, microsoft game, ensemble studio, game studios, ensemble studios, age of empires iv, company representative, future games, age of empires, concept art, sequels, magna, controversy, 20th century, artwork. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.

115 Responses to 'Age of Empires IV and V?'

Bradley said:
on November 20th, 2005 at 4:16 am

Age Of Empires 4 and 5.

It makes good sence and will make a great collection to the 1, 2, 3.
Age Of Empires 3 set after Medievil times to Civilisation. Age Of Empires 4 set in Modern times. Age of Empires 5 set in the future. Now that realy makes AOE fans jump out of their seats. AOE 4, 5 is Expansion packs but im not sure if they are even going to make expansions but as we speak they are making 4 and 5. I also red a artical about Sid Mires remaking AOE 1, and 2 with the help of esemble studios
Fish said:
on November 22nd, 2005 at 12:04 am

Eat chicken
Age of Empires 3 said:
on March 12th, 2006 at 11:18 am

These artwork only represent the 5 ages of Age of Empires III. Ensemble Studios is working for Aoe addon and after they will begin a MMORPG. So I think that this rumor is just a hoax.
dylan cannon said:
on May 9th, 2006 at 10:07 pm

aoe 2 was the best i want to build kingdoms and crap and not modern time games and future
jester smith said:
on May 15th, 2006 at 9:57 pm

I expect that many fans were thrilled at the site of even a hint of AOE 4, and 5 but just because we saw a glimps doesn’t mean that there will be 2 more sequals to the AOE trilogy. i’d like to see two more sequals but to all the other critics you really don’t know if the rumors are true so don’t say it’s a hoax!! The only people who really know are the people in charge of game development, and everybody at microsoft studios
hoooobla said:
on June 9th, 2006 at 5:14 pm

I think that aoe 4 and 5 wont be expansions but games like 1,2 and 3.

Under no doubt do I say that they will be very fun!
Timmah said:
on July 11th, 2006 at 2:32 pm

IV & V cant be expansion packs for III because there is already an expansion pack for III called “The War Chiefs” or somthing… I’ve played all three so far and am eagerly looking foreward to other games from the Age of Empires series.
dar said:
on July 18th, 2006 at 10:50 am

it only makes sense that the next two games will progress further in the future from the previous games. if you look at the artwork so far it has been correct and there is no reason to believe why the next two will not be made also. and for the guy who said that the 5 things are all in aoe 3 you need brain surgery or sumthin cuz aoe 3never goes past the imperial age.
Kenny said:
on August 1st, 2006 at 4:47 pm

hmm how do we get Age of Empires 5?
Tomma said:
on August 3rd, 2006 at 11:21 am

Lol, thats just to sit down and have patience! I suppose AoE 4/5 will be released/announced during the nest 2-3 years. Just to be patient
ryan said:
on August 7th, 2006 at 2:24 pm

AOE IS BRILL, JUST ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO BE IMPROVED. BIGGER POPULATION FOR MY LARGER ARMYS NOT 200, I WAS THINKING MORE LIKE 450!!!1 DOES ANY ONE AGREE
ryan said:
on August 7th, 2006 at 2:26 pm

BIGGER POPULATION FOR HUGE ARMY’S
WES said:
on August 7th, 2006 at 2:27 pm

I AGREE RYAN, IT WOULD BE GREAT IF THEY INCREASED THE POPULATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 PLEASE MIRCOSOFT
Rohnrock said:
on August 11th, 2006 at 1:49 am

So far all the AoE’s have been great. The 2nd and 3rd were awesome! But the problem that I hear alot is a need 4 a bigger population. I agree….even a few 300 sucks, go all the way and make enormous maps with tons of resources with populations going up to 350-800 ppl. Also if the rumors r true about AoE 4 being about WW1 & WW2 that might be fun but i still love the conquering of kingdoms or colonies. The top side to it all is u can only imagine the graphics for future AoE’s (after all the 2nd to the 3rd was a huge change in graphics!).
kent said:
on August 12th, 2006 at 11:31 am

i remeber aoe2 2 be far better game. they need 2 get a camera like dawn of war where u hit alt key .
goon said:
on August 29th, 2006 at 11:54 am

I think a bigger porpulation would be good but could make it very unfair for a weaker player who wouldnt stand a chance. I really like the idea of modern day combat that would be really cool but not too excited if theres gonna be a futuristic aoe .
Josh said:
on September 1st, 2006 at 12:01 pm

I agree that there needs to be a bigger population, more than 200. But then again i agree it would be unfair for weaker plays when they played a stronger player. heck with it more population. I would say anywhere between 250 and 500 would be a good range. Also I like they little things you get for doing good or at least for playing for awhile. I think in there they should give one that lets you have 25 more population. not the actual people just the room to grow 25 more.
just an idea.
joe schmoe said:
on September 9th, 2006 at 12:51 pm

damn AOE 4 sounds awesome. but AOE 5 would probly suck. i like 3 a lot im a big history buff especially around that time period
Johnny said:
on September 27th, 2006 at 3:55 pm

I whant to play AGE OF EMPIRES 4 its will be very nice for me plz i whant i love age of empires
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
chrisy said:
on November 11th, 2006 at 3:28 pm

Isuppose the new Age Of Empires 4 won’t be out for a year or to beacuse AOE 3 only came out last year and plus they need time to make a new 1 but i still prefere age of mythology the titans and AOE 3 but it will be exsiting when the new AOE comes out lol
Jhonny Be Quick said:
on December 5th, 2006 at 11:45 pm

I’m enjoying looking forward to the next couple of age of empires, but i still think number 1 is the best, especially with the gold extention. Well everyone be patient and hope that they don’t make garbage for the next age of empires, i know that all of us are looking forward to it so i suggest just sit back relax, have an expresso and chill, like a home dog, anyway i’m gonna go eat some kiwi soup!!! chill yall
brotherjames said:
on December 6th, 2006 at 4:34 pm

They need to do a remake of AOE 1 and 2 to bring them up to current graphics capabilties extra
Hannah said:
on December 7th, 2006 at 11:42 pm

I love age of empires. Please make AOE IV. I am looking forward to playing Age of Empires IV. Hopefully it will come out before next summer.
albanian_boy said:
on December 9th, 2006 at 4:33 pm

hey suckers we are pleased to have u back age of empires fans.
i’m concered that will age of empires 4 will screw like he screw with aoe 3 .
i bealive that microsoft is going tomake aoe 4 / 5 wors than a 3 or 2 .,
the best was 2 and without manssion
Will said:
on December 17th, 2006 at 3:54 pm

Age of Empiers IV looks like the army today.
I think they will have buildings we have today in it (well almost all).

Age of Empiers V lokks like the future all right.
They might have hover cars going down that one trail I forget what is called because of loseing AOE III disk.
Cornicapus said:
on December 20th, 2006 at 6:31 am

Well i think they stillneed to put in the ages between the imperial and Pre-WWI ages THAT would be good
Metabasalt said:
on December 27th, 2006 at 11:03 am

DirectX10 should allow for more units on the field. I too am a history buff that likes to play games. I hope that they do not skip the Civil War when they put out Age IV to rush to the world wars.
The_Creator said:
on January 9th, 2007 at 9:58 pm

I think AoE 3 is the best and that even if they did do WW1 and WW2 machine guns would not be as good as having the people reload. The units would die too fast. And there would no longer be swords and spears. Only guns.
kick himself said:
on January 9th, 2007 at 11:56 pm

I recon lets kiick out of the old crap and in to the new crap
kick himself said:
on January 9th, 2007 at 11:58 pm

I agree with my self
kick himself said:
on January 10th, 2007 at 12:00 am

we all love you all fans
kick himself said:
on January 10th, 2007 at 12:01 am

JOIN THE CLUB
kick himself said:
on January 10th, 2007 at 12:03 am

dino poop is tough
kick himself said:
on January 10th, 2007 at 12:09 am

a car 4 4 and a hovercar 4 5 would be awesome. so would a machine gun (4) & laser machine gun (5)
kick himself said:
on January 10th, 2007 at 12:10 am

kiss my tough dino poop hayden smith from flinders
Woflywood said:
on January 10th, 2007 at 12:44 pm

If they do make an AoE 5, it would have to stray far from their norm. Mainly because of the fact that they’ll be making up their own characters, not manipulating old types of characters. Also, if AoE 5 would be cast in the future, they’d have to make it different from Starcraft and such, in order to draw in a bigger, newwer crowd.
kick himself said:
on January 11th, 2007 at 6:59 am

i wonder wat the civ’s will be on 5? mayb solar syatem
Silver said:
on January 21st, 2007 at 6:30 pm

If only aoe 2 had more population it would be the best game ever made!!!!
Warkio said:
on January 29th, 2007 at 7:05 am

age of empires 4 sounds good but wif modern age, it’s really hard to play the same kinda of game. Com on, as if there is gonna be resoruces lying around in our times of age.Therefore i suggest: insted of using wood, gold etc. it’ll be heaps better wif money and more urban combat. Rather then soldier standing up-right getting hit
Mario said:
on February 7th, 2007 at 3:51 pm

I dont think that the pics represent the ages in aoe 3, like that guy said down there. But it would be cool to play an aoe vietnam game, it would give the series a different twist, Theyd have to have different resources and stuff like that, but i would definently buy it if it comes out
seunghyun said:
on February 9th, 2007 at 1:49 pm

have anyone played american conquest
its maps are huge and the population is 16000
this is the problems with aoes they need better ideas
the maps need to be much bigger and the max population should be 10000
should be able to change camera angle
plays ww1, ww2, ‘nam war, gulf war, cold war, and more modern with artillery , field guns and tanks and jets, helicopters, bazooka, heavy machine gun, flame throwers
Rynaard said:
on February 25th, 2007 at 4:04 am

I think that AOE 4 (WW1 and WW2) is a graet idea, but AOE 5 should actually be 6 and that the real AOE 5 should deal with today’s period of warfare (i.e Iraq, Gulf war, etc), then only should AOE 6 move on to the future.
Rynaard said:
on February 25th, 2007 at 4:06 am

Quote: “brotherjames said:
on December 6th, 2006 at 4:34 pm

They need to do a remake of AOE 1 and 2 to bring them up to current graphics capabilties extra”

I think that this is a great idea, but maybe they should re-release the entire series as a colletors edition with AOE 1 - 6 (see my previous post)
Rynaard said:
on February 25th, 2007 at 4:27 pm

PS. Your page is actually not XHTML compliant
Amy said:
on February 25th, 2007 at 6:32 pm

Yeah, I definitely agree on a remake of AOE 1 and 2… I played AOE 1 a while ago just for old time’s sake, and I don’t remember it being so shitty… but that era is just so much more interesting to me.

As for the population issue, the problem with increasing population is that for everyone besides the hardest-core gamers, that will create some serious lag in the game. Before I got a new video card, sending an army of like 150 in was choppy at times. Personally, I’d rather have smooth gameplay than more units than I can handle. Luckily, as technology increases, so will our population limits.
JOMAMA said:
on February 27th, 2007 at 2:24 am

U Said it SISTER
JOMAMA said:
on February 27th, 2007 at 2:27 am

POP + ARmY + VILLIES = 342 equals Sound Gaming and no restricitions on Villies + hard core graphics = KIller Game and a must buy
Tim said:
on March 4th, 2007 at 3:31 pm

I think they should take AOE 1-4 or 5 and put them all into one long game and make it so you have to start out in 1 and work your way up through the years in to 4 or 5. But have all the graphics be the same, up to date i mean. I think that would be the best game ever.
Ray said:
on March 4th, 2007 at 7:59 pm

AOE4 and 5 are gonna be the greatest i cant wait till it cums out
Yee said:
on March 4th, 2007 at 8:01 pm

im gonna play aoe4 all the time when it cums out
mic said:
on March 13th, 2007 at 1:39 am

my freind said he found info that aoe 4 was going to be released in late 2007 or early 2008 and aoe 5 in 2009, the trouble is that halo wars (a xbox 360 game only)is set in the hlo eara, the future it may be more populure mind you it is being made by ES.
mic said:
on March 13th, 2007 at 1:41 am

hlo is halo spelling mistake
Arbo said:
on March 14th, 2007 at 7:22 am

i think if dey make th grafics any better, then itd b 2 hard to run on anything but the best comps. My comp cant even handl sea battles for aoe3!
mic said:
on March 15th, 2007 at 4:36 pm

halo wars coming out somtime 2008
mic said:
on March 25th, 2007 at 1:38 am

maybe halo wars is AOE 5, but then why havent we herad about AOE 4 and halo wars being AOE 5, dosnt make much sense.
caleb said:
on March 29th, 2007 at 6:43 am

this is cool but if they made aoe 5 it would be a little better but aoe 6 would way better they would have to make it better than halo if they did i would freak!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
caleb said:
on March 29th, 2007 at 6:50 am

this game is asome chek this site go on it not mine thoe www.maidmarian.com
if you want mine go on www.gamestar.homestead.com ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Siegel said:
on March 31st, 2007 at 4:23 pm

How can you guys sit there and say if, if the company make 4&5. Why wouldnt they? AoE 1,2,&3 made alot of money. Plus most of us enjoyed all 3 titles. Am I wrong? They are sitting on a gold mine and they know it. AoE rocks!
billybobjoe said:
on April 2nd, 2007 at 10:31 am

You said it Arbo!!!!!!! down wit the rich kids who get all the high-tech stuff they want. >_
mat said:
on April 12th, 2007 at 9:47 am

just remake aoe 2.. that was the best
FableFan42 said:
on April 13th, 2007 at 3:14 am

I’m sure that if they make an age of empires 4 that there will be huge campaigns like WW1, WW2, Veitnam, Ireland and more so for me it looks great I can’t wait!
aoelover said:
on April 16th, 2007 at 2:50 pm

they already made a new aoe game called dawn of man
Splicerxp said:
on April 23rd, 2007 at 7:54 pm

Oh hell yah i think a few 2 games could turn the AOE around and the art depicts it all everything falls as it was originally set from 400 BC from the first AOE too the second one with time lines as 1300’s too 1600’s and AOE 3 from timelines as 1700’s too the 1800’s(late 1600’s too) if POSSIBLE AOE 4 will fall into the 19th Century and the 5th could fall into the 20,21,22 Century i think it would be great but even a myth can die eventually and is not true but hope is always needed in great games thats my opinion and statement
mark said:
on May 23rd, 2007 at 8:06 am

aoe 4 should still b in history it wud suk if it werrnt cuz they wud hav 2 change everything and it wouldnt be zbout civilisations just winning a war killing people it wud get boring
Mr.X said:
on May 23rd, 2007 at 5:00 pm

I think they would probally base AoE IV up to World War I instead of going straight to modern times then probally go up to World War II then do modern times they still have alot of history to covor before modern warfare especailly during the World Wars when weopon technology has a huge change in it
hhhhhyuyi said:
on May 24th, 2007 at 2:13 am

hurry up nd make it
knowledge said:
on June 5th, 2007 at 6:54 pm

Hell, I just like the idea of people commenting on aoe 4/5. I know the people behind will do a damn good job of making the grahics better, the cities bigger, the armies larger and more time 2 kick a&% before you die. I’m for aoe 4/5 and if they go anymore. I’m game for that 2.
Annonymoose said:
on June 11th, 2007 at 5:35 pm

I think planes would be amazing!!
I think you should be able to select more people, see people in boats and have up to 700 pop. I think they should replace cav. with tanks, make more infantry- average soldiers, mach. gun, bazooka, trench mortars, medics etc.
I think they should have loads of planes- realistic with fuel- fighters, straffers, bombers, nuc. bombers, heavy bombers, helicopters, parachuters, transport planes and all sorts.
I think they should have mega long range artiillary, and howitzers and anti-tanks, and for ships- subs, aircraft carriers, battleships, and loads of others.
finally I think they should have loads of civs and have loads of good special units like SAS commandos and Navy seals and nuc. subs.
Annonymoose said:
on June 11th, 2007 at 5:37 pm

o yeah, and heros
Wololo said:
on July 1st, 2007 at 9:49 am

Hmmm, did everyone not notice the fall release of the Asian Dynasties expansion pack for AoE 3? Japan, China, India? It looks interesting. Should hold people over for the next year or 2 till the possibility of an AoE IV becomes a reality. Also, there’s no chance of a full scale AoE IV before late ‘08 to ‘09 as Microsoft is pumping most if not all of it’s resources into the psudo multi=platform Halo. (READ: BUNGIE.NET & XBOX LIVE)

www.agecommunity.com/press.aspx?PressReleaseID=161
erk said:
on July 9th, 2007 at 6:04 pm

a remake would be the best
they could add better online mutiplayer capabilities
better graphics
more campaign modes
they should make one that shows inbetween one and 2 when europe was destroyed by the saxons
Razorwire said:
on July 11th, 2007 at 3:22 pm

“I agree that there needs to be a bigger population, more than 200. But then again i agree it would be unfair for weaker plays when they played a stronger player.”

Fair vs. unfair/ Stronger vs. weaker… It’s nonsense.

The “weaker” player would either improve or “die”. Becoming a better player and honing one’s skills is the whole point. Nat’chul selection, baby. Some of us have no time for coddling the weak.
Chan said:
on July 17th, 2007 at 9:56 pm

They probably shouldnt have gotten us all jumpy about future releases, because well start anticipating them too much and forget about aoe 3. :/
GoTn_Kaori said:
on July 20th, 2007 at 6:24 am

I, a memeber of a populer clan in Age of Mythology agree that they shall make IV and V as it would bring the ratings up in Esemble studios and ESO. Also, i read an artical on one of the creators of AOE ,Sid Mires, told us about how he made AOE one and two and that he is considering to remake them in todays Microsoft graphics. I, a very loyal fan of ES would like to say that i would love to see two new AOE games come out in the futuer IV and V or mabey even more than two.
Deathfromabove said:
on July 20th, 2007 at 11:51 pm

Dude, i have always wished that AOE would do something for like WWII. That would be awsome. And for the future thing, like someone else said, it would be nice if they stray from spacecrafts and stuff, mabey as transports but that’s about it.
Shadow said:
on July 21st, 2007 at 9:08 pm

I can’t imagine modern warfare in AoE, it’ll be too much like Command and Conquer. maybe they can pull it off, but i’ll miss the medieval time period
Lord of Nazgûl said:
on August 3rd, 2007 at 4:23 am

I agree with all who are saying that there shouldn’t be a futuristic age, WWII is as far as my interest goes. however i’d be happy with more medieval times as well. The concept of AoEIII and AoM i didn’t like as much as the others. To Shadow, what i’d like to see to be taken from C&C is how soldiers can gain experience. Also what would be fun to see is if one could arrest opponents or if armys that get badly beaten would run away etc. That would bring a whole new level and one would have to have great leaders and develop them so that they would prevent a panic among the ranks etc
sibee said:
on August 11th, 2007 at 3:54 am

i agree i like the idea of WWI and WWII but what would the ages be because it wouldnt be the same if you didnt advance through ages. and it would be different gathering resources because during WWII they didnt just go and start picking berry bushes like in Aoe2. i guess aoe5 reminds me of halo now that i think of it so that has potential too i guess
yipyap said:
on August 21st, 2007 at 2:59 am

i think there should be more pop like on the totalwar games rometotalwar
medevaltotalwar are way cooler because you can have thousandths of
guys i wish ao4 and 5 could have more pop
sonnyjim said:
on August 21st, 2007 at 3:01 am

i agree with yipyap
fanatic said:
on August 21st, 2007 at 3:10 am

i agree with yipyap but i wish people woulbnt stick up for the weaker players the world is tought get better or die

survival of the fitest not this feel sorry for these nerds trying to learn how to play i also think aoe should aim more like total war put people on walls ladders seige toweres MORE MEN 500-1000` NOT 300 the only thing bad about aog1 was you could only have 50 MEN PATHETIC also maby a remake of 1 and 2 would be very cool in aoe2 they didnt have enough about the crusades maby a new teams templer nights or kingdom of jerusalem
wallymcwonton said:
on August 29th, 2007 at 7:00 pm

They should do a WWI WWII and then modern combat then work into the future
wallymcwonton said:
on August 29th, 2007 at 7:01 pm

also they should remake aoe II
Andalus said:
on September 7th, 2007 at 4:50 am

2 hell with this modern crap. If they do anything - should remake 1 and 2.

tht said, aoe was great while it lasted - the godfather of rts, but sad 2 say it guys:
AOE IS DEAD.

its creative assembly thats sitting on a gold mine with newer games like total war
lm said:
on September 8th, 2007 at 3:30 pm

i want to build ancient empires like egypt, babylone, greece, rome and stuff i would really like for you to remake aoe1 with better graphics and stuff it’ll rock!
Cwalk said:
on September 16th, 2007 at 1:34 am

ok this is how it should go…. forget the aoe 5 future crap..leave that to halo, halo has got that on lock down. Aoe 4 should between 1850-1950 and the population should be more on the scale of 300-aprox 375-400 and the final thing they should do is change this map crap. why the hell is there 4 diff countries on Yucatan or great plains…doesnt make sense. the country u pick should be the map you get and that would also cut out the double games in online play cuz thats pretty pointless. Nothing more i hate than a double russian game. But anyhow, the civ u pick is the map you get and speaking that there will be planes and mass transportation and what not it only makes sense to do it that way. theres no point of flying from 1 side of map to the other bombing people. That will cut out the corny rush crap, you should have to organize a plan attack rather than send 5 troops here 5 troops there and end up wining the game over non skill crap and take it from me ima 1st lie goin on cap in Aoe 3 so i know wats up.
GoTn_Kaori said:
on September 25th, 2007 at 6:05 pm

do you not think that guns in AOE will be crap… because if we think about this here.. if they brought out a V it wouldent be empires.. it would be age of the future or somthing.. dont you think?
Desmond said:
on October 16th, 2007 at 8:20 am

Considering that picture? The concept that is given the Roman numeral IV in the booklet? Yeah, that’s not WW1…it’s more of post-WW2 to Vietnam. Though, no doubt Ensemble would inclue both world wars, in addition to Vietnam….I’m thinking…you’ve got colonization of the new world….making the jump to the beginning of modern warfare pretty large. You’d think they’d need a…transition…But how many major battles are between colonization and modernization huh? I mean…Revolutionary, Napoleonic, Civil…I suppose you could throw some of the late Ottomon warring in there…a few of the early Russian conflicts….but still, a lot of that is seperated by a lot of time. So, who knows. Personally, I don’t see the problem with modern or even futuristic war. If anyone can do it right, it’d be Ensemble. And, think about it, if AoE was to continue…we’d have to get there one of these days, eh? But also….one of the things that made AoE so huge was the fact that it payed attention to historic detail….so, perhaps ES will only make games up to ‘today’s’ time, eh? Though, it’s a bit more difficult to catch heroes in the ‘wars’ of today, heh.
taylor said:
on November 28th, 2007 at 7:06 pm

quit talking to yourself
gg said:
on December 2nd, 2007 at 5:23 am

How much will they skip will there be any expansions after AOE 3 besides war chiefs. And how far will they go in modern day.
Abdul said:
on December 3rd, 2007 at 12:09 pm

When does aoe 4and 5 come out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Abdul said:
on December 3rd, 2007 at 12:10 pm

When does aoe 4and 5 come out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!???????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????????
Sini said:
on December 4th, 2007 at 2:59 pm

i think the best edition was Age of Empires 2…so many good memories playing it =) anyway i thin they should make Age of Empires IV WW1 & WW2 and 5 should be Modern Day not that future crap..no one likes the future crap..lol
ThaiGambit said:
on December 6th, 2007 at 8:23 am

Age of Empires IV and V would be like playing rise of nations at the later ages…AoE 1 and 2 were so much better…with the introduction to guns it seems that fighting would become boring because everything would be fought at a distance…bring back the sword and arrows…let’s fight with honor
shickmen said:
on December 10th, 2007 at 10:45 pm

fuck ages of empire 4,5,3,2,1 fuck u all get a life
kjh said:
on December 10th, 2007 at 10:48 pm

naruto3 is

better

.l5k;j5lk;k5l ;5kl; 5kjl4;ljjl;4
Not needed said:
on December 17th, 2007 at 9:26 pm

I think that Age of Empires 4is going to be a blast, bot not Age of Empires 5, it is going to be to future like, , and that is not my personal interest. AOE 3 is the best, and I think AOE 4 is going to be even better. I am guessing that AOE 4 will be out in late 2007 or early 2008, but I can’t wait.

They also need to clean up AOE 1 and 2, there graphics are a mess, it would be fun if it had the graphics of AOE 3, but I know that will never happen, they are proboly to foucused on AOE 4 and 5..
asdf said:
on December 20th, 2007 at 1:49 pm

Age of Empires belongs in old times, not modern times. Please don’t make a modern Age of Empires, that’s what Company of Heroes is for. Make another Roman Empire one but with really awesome graphics and realistic units and all. Not boats that go on land lol (true fans know what I am talking about)
meiyo said:
on January 1st, 2008 at 6:09 pm

does anyone else realize that V looks like a halo character?? i read as many comments but didnt see it mentioned.
bibo said:
on January 5th, 2008 at 8:36 pm

age of empires 2 is da best yo all hope there is going to be age of empires 4
Anonymous said:
on February 20th, 2008 at 5:28 pm

I think before they release an aoe IV they should remake aoe I and II. Just improve the graphics don’t make them the same format as aoe III. Also they could make a sequel to aom. Like the chinese, celts and romans maybe.
James said:
on March 22nd, 2008 at 3:38 pm

Surely Age of ‘Empires’ 4 and 5 would be quite redundant as the whole concept of ‘Empire’ died off at around 1914? Of course the British Empire still maintained an Empire, but hardly anybody else’s did, so surely the game would be pretty boring?

Also age of empires 1,2 and 3 span through long generations whereas Age of Empires 4 (if it doesn’t turn out to be fake) would just span 60-80 years at most(probably start in the late 1880s with expansion into Asia and China then possibly end after WW2.
James said:
on March 22nd, 2008 at 3:39 pm

Sorry; I mean ‘formal imperialism’ (1914 business)
Daniel said:
on May 31st, 2008 at 6:53 am

use r gay but aom isnt
Chimalpopoca said:
on June 17th, 2008 at 4:50 pm

i hope somtime in november come out aoe 4
Chimalpopoca said:
on June 17th, 2008 at 4:52 pm

all age of empirez come out in november
Chimalpopoca said:
on June 20th, 2008 at 4:11 pm

in 2009 november dey can create expansions to aoe 1, 2.
Thangs dey can do:

better grafic dan aoe 3
new buildings
homecity
almost all factions got only unique units
new factions like: inca, livonians, russians etc. all factions about 50 to play
more triggas in scenarios
more popullation about 1000
smaller units
bigger ships
on all ships r sailors
units got much smaller hp
with swords cant attack buildings n ships
arrow n gunpowder units can run out ammo den dey can go to castle or other millitary building n get new ammunation
playas r revarded when dey destroy some other playa
new animals to hunt.
will said:
on July 5th, 2008 at 4:41 am

I LOVE Age of Empires III, but there’s always the same thing in ANY strategy game: CAN WE BE ABLE TO SELECT AS MANY SOLDIERS AS WE WANT?!
Because in any strategy game, the maximum you can have is, like, 30 - 40 people! Why can’t we be able to have HUGE and PROPER armies to the march. Instead of this pathetic little group! Well, fair enough, it’s enough to defeat the enemy, but it would be cool to select as many as wished though.
Anyway: still looking forward to AoE VI. AND ESPESIALLY AoE V!!
AWJ said:
on August 4th, 2008 at 2:19 am

They should definitely increase the population capacity for the Age of Empries franchise. Two-hundred is not nearly enough, especially when some units take up multiple spaces. Everything should be worth 1 population and you should be able to make between 500 and 1000 people.

By the way, try out Nemesis of The Roman Empire, you can have however large or small a population you want and it runs very smoothly. Plus, for people with slower computers, just limit the population to the 200 and under capacity.

All this garbage about how it would make it harder for weaker players to play tougher players is trash. Ever heard of the theory of evolution? In the real world every country doesn’t have the same population. The biggest, toughest countries survive and prosper, the little ones become extintct. It’s natural selection in action, and boy do we need some more action.
james said:
on August 8th, 2008 at 1:14 am

I think 4 every home city level up u should get 1 extra pop or 2 or 5. Also and then also we should have national borders or territory.
james said:
on August 8th, 2008 at 1:18 am

More maps and civs too and possibly make a gold edition later on
james said:
on August 8th, 2008 at 1:29 am

Also trade needs to be improved past carts and markets
ur muma said:
on September 10th, 2008 at 1:48 pm

lol fuck ye i think they should make it but i think they should make a age of mythoology 3 first ,BLUT,BLUT!
ur muma said:
on September 10th, 2008 at 1:50 pm

THEY MADE IT OMG THEY MADE IT if u read dis i tricked you!=]
leo said:
on September 19th, 2008 at 1:30 am

guys just buy star wars galactic battle grounds