Kotaku doesn’t care about you
Kotaku reports that after a year of promising, they’ve finally developed a method of invitational commentation. From what I gather, this invitational system is like Gmail in that they invite you, and in turn you invite your friends. So whom is Kotaku inviting? Tipsters, bloggers, and anyone working inside a major developing or publishing company. It seems as if Kotaku is only inviting those whom they deem worthy–the avant-guarde of multimedia.
So what does this mean for the average joe reader? Tough luck, unless you have a friend in the business. Having an elitist system like this where one must convince Kotaku of one’s own credentials smells not only of arrogance, but also of pure-bred disdain. Kotaku doesn’t care about its mainstream audience, or at least not enough to guarantee them a voice without the painstaking process of acquiring an invitation.
On one hand, I can see the benefits of such a system, namely, the people they invite are much less likely to spam them or post “excessively self-promotional, obnoxious, or even worse, boring” material. But this system seems difficult to become a part of, and it destroys the concept of honest feedback. By creating a system of rules prohibiting vague terms such as “boring” or “obnoxious” material, it’s almost an argumentum ad baculum to those fortunate enough to get an invite, with the ultimate mandate: entertain Kotaku, or else.
Here at ElliottBack.com, anyone can comment, 100% of the time, on anything. Spam is avoided by an ingenious plugin called Hash-Cash, obscenities are non-existent due to a “Politifier Plugin“, and freedom of speech is easily accessible simply by typing and posting your comment. At Elliottback.com, everyone is invited!
This entry was posted on Friday, October 14th, 2005 at 6:01 pm and is tagged with argumentum ad baculum, hash cash, mainstream audience, kotaku, gmail, vague terms, honest feedback, freedom of speech, tipsters, obscenities, tough luck, average joe, disdain, arrogance, avant guarde, publishing company, mandate, bloggers, credentials, invitation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.
3 Responses to 'Kotaku doesn’t care about you'
Leave a Reply
Please take time to enjoy the archives: August 2008 (5) July 2008 (2) June 2008 (1) May 2008 (1) April 2008 (1) March 2008 (1) January 2008 (1) December 2007 (1) November 2007 (3) October 2007 (5) September 2007 (2) August 2007 (2) July 2007 (2) June 2007 (4) May 2007 (9) April 2007 (3) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (8) January 2007 (16) December 2006 (10) November 2006 (7) October 2006 (4) September 2006 (6) August 2006 (12) July 2006 (24) June 2006 (26) May 2006 (6) April 2006 (23) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (10) January 2006 (18) December 2005 (34) November 2005 (46) October 2005 (36)
Fresh, related resources:
- Spliced feed for Public Relations Network
While we here at inmedia have long maintained there is little difference between bloggers and conventional journalists when it comes to pitching, we do appreciate that many bloggers do not care at all to be pitched by us PR types. ... - What about me?
Since the site is based off getting your moneys worth with games it seemed like a great chance to create a unique review system (or completely ripoff Kotaku's new setup ,whichever one is easier). Obviously this didn't happen and the ... - Too Human Too Exposed?
Now I've played it and, you know, it's a good game. It doesn't deserve a lot of that harsh criticism. But as soon as something starts it's very hard to turn the tide and pull it back again. Unless you've got something in your back ... - Kotaku - Too Human Review: Dyack's Human Too [Review]
But the first felt like a plunge into the middle of a story that I wasn't even sure I wanted to care about yet. This sort of starting in the middle approach might work for some, but Silicon Knights just doesn't have the chops to pull it ... - Too Human Review: Dyack's Human Too
Character Development: If you want to sell a game with its story you have to make characters people care about. In Too Human the main characters are so flat, so underdeveloped that it's hard to feel anything when they start dropping ...
on October 23rd, 2005 at 12:48 am
whine whine whine whine whine! i like exclusive websites. Makes me feel so phisticated.
on May 12th, 2006 at 12:02 am
God save the Sex Pistols One means it, subjects We love our boys God bless
on February 23rd, 2007 at 3:17 pm
This is by far the dumbest shameless plug I’ve ever seen